Fabian Marozsan vs Brandon Nakashima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 03:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Marozsan vs B. Nakashima

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Marozsan 1 - 0 Nakashima
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fabian Marozsan winning 2 and Brandon Nakashima winning 0. The last match between Fabian Marozsan and Brandon Nakashima was at the Almaty Open - Almaty, 15-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Fabian Marozsan getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marozsan | 1 |
| Nakashima | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Almaty Open - Almaty(10-15-25)
F. Marozsan vs B. Nakashima H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,511,810 | Career Prize Money | $3,667,225 |
| 61.00% (280-179) | Career Total W/L | 60.37% (259-170) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (26-26) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.46% (32-29) |
F. Marozsan vs B. Nakashima Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance compare between the two players recently? Brandon Nakashima has a slight edge, winning 48.88% of second serve points compared to Fabian Marozsan's 45.93%.
- In recent return games, Nakashima has won 43.73% of opponents' second serve points, slightly higher than Marozsan's 41.10%. Could this give Nakashima a return game advantage?
- When comparing first serve return points, Marozsan has a small edge, winning 24.53% against Nakashima's 23.95%.
- Under pressure, Nakashima has saved 61.09% of breakpoints, outperforming Marozsan, who saved 57.20%. Does this suggest Nakashima handles pressure better?
- In terms of overall match win rate over the last year, Nakashima's 52.38% slightly surpasses Marozsan's 51.79%.
- Surface preference indicates Nakashima excels on Indoor hard courts with a 70% win rate, whereas Marozsan thrives on Clay, winning 70% there.
- Both players mainly compete on the Main tour with similar success rates: Nakashima at 56.76% and Marozsan at 55.56%.
- Nakashima has faced slightly stronger opponents, with an average rank of 74.17 compared to Marozsan's average of 82.91.
- In deciding sets, Marozsan has a better record, winning 59% compared to Nakashima's 43%.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
Based on second serve and return game stats, Brandon Nakashima shows slightly better performance in recent form. His second serve is marginally stronger, and he has a better percentage in returning opponents' second serves.
While Nakashima's pressure handling skills, exemplified by his higher breakpoint save percentage, give him an edge, Fabian Marozsan's superior record in deciding sets may play a role if the match extends to the final set.
Surface preference might be a factor, especially if this event is not held on clay, where Marozsan typically excels. Nakashima's history of facing stronger opponents might also work in his favor, indicating readiness for high-caliber matches.
Overall, considering the nuances in playing conditions and statistical edges, Brandon Nakashima is slightly favored to win this upcoming match.
Fabian Marozsan vs Brandon Nakashima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Marozsan vs B. Nakashima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1:19:15 | Average Match Time | 1:19:15 |
| 73% (43/59) | 1st Serve % | 77% (47/61) |
| 74% (32/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (33/47) |
| 75% (12/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (5/14) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (23/61) | Return Points Win % | 25% (15/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Marozsan Recent Matches Played
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played

F. Marozsan vs B. Nakashima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.00% (280/179) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.37% (259/170) |
| 58.95% (642/447) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.66% (623/439) |
| 53.66% (5544/4787) | Games Win/Loss | 52.93% (5576/4959) |
| 62.00% (62/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.48% (127/83) |
| 63.57% (185/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (35/35) |
| 51.85% (28/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.00% (67/33) |
| 35.71% (5/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 61.22% (30/19) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
| 1360 | Aces Total | 2971 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 939 | Total Double Faults | 711 |
| 1:23:12 | Average Match Time | 1:46:48 |
| 389.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 282.25 |
| 65% (19070/29341) | 1st Serve % | 64% (20242/31697) |
| 69% (13194/19070) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (15063/20242) |
| 51% (5281/10271) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (6180/11455) |
| 42% (1240/2950) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (1023/2729) |
| 40% (11597/29172) | Return Points Win % | 37% (12113/32928) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Slam W/L | 48.89% (22/23) |
| 60.87% (28/18) | Masters W/L | 46.97% (31/35) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (3/0) |
| 45.16% (28/34) | Main Tour W/L | 58.86% (93/65) |
| 68.27% (71/33) | Challenger W/L | 69.40% (93/41) |
| 64.95% (139/75) | Futures W/L | 73.91% (17/6) |
| 62% (269/432) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (229/379) |
| 39% (9/23) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (26/46) |
| 55% (85/154) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (135/248) |
| 54% (75/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (67/135) |
| 84% (286/239) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (261/223) |
| 16% (286/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (261/38) |
| 24% (173/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (167/34) |